On 30 May 16:02, Guillem Barba Domingo wrote: > El 30/05/2014 0:08, "Cédric Krier" <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com> va escriure: > > > > On 29 May 20:16, Guillem Barba Domingo wrote: > > > > It behaves the same way always. SHIFT-click == open in the next right > > > > notebook. And menu is considered in the first notebook. > > > > > > IMHO I mantain the current behaviour of SHIFT+click (current == 3.0, not > > > PoC), which is open the action in a new Tab despite of reuse the current > > > tab for the same action. > > > > I don't understand what you are saying. > > Just try it. > > Well, I will be more explicit. > Open from menu the list of sales (or tasks or anything): I do it with a > doubleclick in the menu entry. > Repeat the action. It doesn't open a new tab, it focus on the previous > opened tab. > Now, repeat the action but mantain pressed the SHIFT key when doubleclick > the mennu entry => it opens a new tab
Totally the expected behavior. You request to open the window on an other tab so there are no reason to not do it. > > > But currently it only works when click in menu, not in relate action nor > > > bookmarks, so I should extend the behaviour to everywhere. > > > > Still don't understand. > > And now? > > > > I should put the feature of split notebook area in the client's menus > (in > > > existing or in a new "window" menu). > > > > Don't understand. > > Your proposal could be called "multi notebook" or "split window". > I don't care about the name, but as the SHIFT modifier is already used (and > it is VERY useful and IMHO more coherent with the "new window" behaviour > found in browsers), I propose to have explicit options in menu. Still don't understand. What are «explicit options in menu»? > I think it majes more simple the behaviour: one action is split the window, > and it splits the active ones, Which action? > and other independent action is open the > view (which is opened in the active window or the first one starting from > the left). Which other action? > This behaviour and menu options are usuak in KDE. I don't know about Gnome > or OS X. I don't understand why you are talking about desktop when we are at application level. > > > Maybe it coukd be able the option of > > > split vertically (what is done in PoC) and horizontally. > > > > What is the goal to split horizontally. If it is just for the sake of > > having an option, it is wrong. Less option == better UI. > > For the same than split vertically, make easier to compare or work on two > lists or forms at the same time. So if it is the same, we already have the feature. > For example, to compare/work on two lists with lot of fields, it's better > tow split horitontally than vertical. Don't think any layout will fix that because it is the task that is not userfriendly. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgppSqe9peqH5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
