2014-06-16 21:57 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > On 16 Jun 18:51, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > > 2014-06-15 21:33 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tested sao with this: > > > https://jquery-ui-bootstrap.github.io/jquery-ui-bootstrap/ > > > There are some issues like button with 2 icons but globally it renders > the > > > application nicer. I think we could try to help the project to fix > those > > > issues and maybe we could use it as default theme instead of the > > > jquery-ui.css. > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. We at NaN·tic have talked several times that bootstrap > > looks much better than jquery-ui themes. Even some people argued about > > using bootstrap without jquery-ui. What is the advantage of using > jquery-ui > > + bootstrap instead of just using bootstrap? What is the missing > > functionality we need? > > The advantage is that jquery-ui does it best to support older browser > when bootstrap just doesn't care at all and rely on latest feature of > browsers. > > Also bootstrap is missing some widget we need: > > - autocomplete > - datepicker > - menu > > Maybe some of them could be implemented using bootstrap but it is much > easier with jquery-ui because it is designed as a javascript library > when bootstrap is much more designed as a css with some javascript when > there is no other solution. >
Now I understand. Thanks a lot! -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
