On 18 Jun 02:33, Stephan Patzwaldt wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. Juni 2014 15:55:24 UTC+2 schrieb Albert Cervera i Areny: > > > > 2014-06-17 11:02 GMT+02:00 <stephan....@googlemail.com <javascript:>>: > > > >> Just one note: I guess BOM stands for bill of materials. I think from the > >> class definition in the wiki it would be appropriate to call the class SOP > >> for standard operation procedure because it fulfills the requirements for > >> a > >> process description according to quality management standards like ISO > >> 9001. > >> > > > > I also have my concern about naming it "BOM". However I think SOP is not > > correct either because it doesn't really describe a process but simply > > contains the products that will be consumed, the ones that will be created > > and the machines and people involved. > > > > I think with the sequence and the description fields the model as defined > in the wiki [1] is sufficient to describe a process step by step. In fact > it isn't even limited to production processes, also maintenance or even > training of employees could be documented with this model if product fields > are allowed to be empty. So it is a full ressource workload and cost > documentation module or - to put it simply - a resource activity module. > There could be added a category field to the BOM/SOP class to tag the type > of processes (e.g. production, start up, maintenance, ...) .
Maybe just using a Reference field. > [1] https://code.google.com/p/tryton/wiki/ProductionProcesses -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpy9wU5YUUYl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
