On 2016-03-13 11:26, Oscar Alvarez wrote: > Hi devs, > > I want to share with yours, a "new" discovery about the performance on > Tryton when it render a report in format odt vs ods, for this case: > > 1. The size file in ods report is 58% less than odt, of course both files > has same quantity data and the similar design (See files attached) > > 2. The speed of render each report is: > > odt -> 39.0 seconds > ods -> 32.3 seconds > > To create an ods is 17% faster than odt. This values are important when in > the accounting to exist high number of account moves and move lines. > > The report template used is very similar to general ledger. > > I thinking about if open a new issue (features), for to migrate some reports > (not all) to ods format instead odt.
This is known since long ago: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue1399 But I don't think we must change the default format. ODS is not really a good format for layout while ODT is designed for that (that's why it is slower). About the performance issue of report like General Ledger, for me, it makes no sense to create an ODT nor ODS of it if you have a lot of data because it is any way useless. Indeed improving the situation is the goal of https://bugs.tryton.org/issue4996 where it is not required to use the Report to have access to the data and also CSV export could be used. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton-dev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton-dev/20160313164834.GR25642%40tetsuo.
