* Betr.: " [tryton] Re: GPL3 <-> AGPL for Tryton?" (Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:54:17 +0100):
> * Betr.: " [tryton] Re: GPL3 <-> AGPL for Tryton?" (Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:37:35 > +0100): > > > On 31/10/09 11:15 +0100, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > * Betr.: " [tryton] Re: GPL3 <-> AGPL for Tryton?" (Fri, 30 Oct 2009 > > > 14:53:41 +0100): > > > > And any way, I don't see any SaaS problem except if you want to be the > > > > only one to provide this service. > > > > > > The SaaS problem is for me to be able to distribute services based on > > > Tryton without (re)distributing possible developments to the customer > > > resp. the community, thus circumventing GPL3. > > > > > > > So if the customer wants to have the source, he just needs to not use this > > kind of service. > > So you agree with the possible misuse of Tryton code, contrary to the > intention when putting it under GPL? I would prefer a solution to inhibit such > a situation. IANAL, but reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License and http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html gives me the impression, that AGPL3 was exactly made for this purpose: "We recommend that developers consider using the GNU AGPL for any software which will commonly be run over a network." -- Mathias Behrle MBSolutions Gilgenmatten 10 A D-79114 Freiburg Tel: +49(761)471023 Fax: +49(761)4770816 http://mbsolutions.selfip.biz UStIdNr: DE 142009020 PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x89BCA161
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
