On 12/05/11 09:45 +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote: > This makes me wonder if perhaps the whole required state machinery needs > to be able to allow zero values on numeric fields to satisfy the > requirement. I'm well aware of where this comes from: in python numeric > values of zero evaluate to False. However, is a business context an > explicit zero-amount is *not* the same as an unspecified amount, or in > other words: 0 is not False, only False is False.
Have you ideas about how we could be sure to not have zero-amount per error? -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpk9bR87PnZ2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
