On 27/06/11 16:14 +0200, Dr. Axel Braun wrote: > Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > On 27/06/11 08:29 -0500, Michael Hipp wrote: > > > On 6/27/2011 7:34 AM, Sasa Ostrouska wrote: > > > >I think thats pretty clear, we want back CODE. Which permits us to > > > >learn from and grow up. > > > >Isn't this a good way of payment ? > > > > > > Sure, it's a great form of payment. I'd be thrilled to offer back > > > any changes/improvements/additions I manage to make to Tryton > > > itself. > > > > > > But do you really want back code that works with Tryton but is not a > > > part of Tryton? > > > If it is a derivative work then yes we want it to be under GPL. > > If it is not a derivative work then do what you want. > > Sorry, I got one question in this context. > I understand that commercial improvements shall go back to the tryton > community.
You must understand that the GPL license give the copyleft to the user not the author. So you own nothing to the community. (I don't understand the term "commercial improvements") > What if I develop some changes/modules just to use within my own business. Do > I have to hand this back as well? > I can imagine two scenarios: > - improve some standard functionality in tryton. Here it makes sense to hand > this back t the community > - add new functionality that is strategic to my business, and is only used > internal. Here I may not want to publish it. > > A final sentence on this is appreciated. With the above sentence, I think it is clear that it is not required to publish anything. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpbmuq29LoHS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
