A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 19:23:43, Cédric Krier va escriure: > > Such a simple model could be used by a more complete production order > > which could have a set of "Production Moves". This means that a full > > production order could have some "Production Moves" already completed > > and other "Production Moves" not completed yet. > > I don't see the advantages of this model. > For me, your "Production Move" is a production and your "Production" looks > like a bunch of productions.
In fact it's exactly this as long as you do not put "too much stuff" in the production order (the name doesn't matter after all). The idea is to keep the basis really simple so it's easy to automate things if necessary. It all depends in how one wants to implement the initial production order model, but from the experience of OpenERP that one has too many things for some simple cases. Also the fact that a production order has several subproductions (if we want to call it that way) is very usual so that should be also easily doable (again it's important that the basic version is very simple). -- Albert Cervera i Areny http://www.NaN-tic.com OpenERP Partners Tel: +34 93 553 18 03 http://twitter.com/albertnan http://www.nan-tic.com/blog -- [email protected] mailing list
