On 10/08/12 20:12 +0200, Cédric Krier wrote: > On 09/08/12 10:14 +0200, Cédric Krier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I try to implement the ending of assets based on review439002 [1]. > > I will summarize how it works: > > > > - Buy assets: on the invoice the account asset (defined on the product) > > is used instead of expense. > > > > - Create assets depreciation: periodical moves are done between the > > account depreciation and expense (defined on the product). > > Of course, the depreciation and the asset accounts could be the same. > > > > - Ending of the assets: > > > > - Last depreciation is done. We should make a move to purge the > > depreciation and the asset account and put the difference into the > > expense account. > > > > - Asset Lost before the last depreciation. We do the same as for > > "Last depreciation". *Question*: is it always the expense account > > to use? Should we ask for a different account? > > > > - Asset Sold before the last depreciation. We do the same as for > > "Last depreciation" but instead of the expense account we use the > > revenue account. *Question*: is it always the revenue account to > > use? Should we ask for a different account? > > > > > > [1] http://codereview.tryton.org/439002/ > > I updated the codereview. This one doesn't contain any ask for an > different account but the structure is in place to allow someone to add > it via a module. > For me, the patch now is complete so you are invited to test it.
It seems that for closing assets, it is better to use the revenue account instead of the expense one (where we booked the depreciation). Anyone can confirm this? -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpBtvGsIoJwF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
