On 28/12/12 01:16 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > A Divendres, 28 de desembre de 2012 01:06:20, Cédric Krier va escriure: > > On 27/12/12 23:49 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > > > > So ok to drop the required on party but then opportunity must have a > > > > code filled by a sequence and party must become required to be > > > > converted. > > > > > > Agreed with the code + sequence. What do you mean by "to be converted"? > > > You mean to be converted from lead to opportunity? If so, I agree, too. > > > > I mean from opportunity to converted. > > Of course in that case will be needed because we cannot create the sale, > otherwise. The question is if we want the party to be assigned/created in > order to allow the user to create the opportunity, which sounds reasonable to > me as an opportunity should apply to already qualified leads.
Sounds good. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgppTPjXqKZ91.pgp
Description: PGP signature
