Dear Kaushik and all On 09/03/2013 06:48 AM, Kaushik S wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 2:44:48 PM UTC+5:30, Cédric Krier wrote: > > On 03/09/13 02:04 -0700, Kaushik S wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 2:16:53 PM UTC+5:30, Cédric Krier > wrote: > > > > > > > > > So for me, there is fundamentaly something wrong in the design of the > workflow. If you can not do the matching, there is no way to get this > work correctly. > > > > > Ok. But we do have a problem matching the persons' two ids automatically. > I guess what you are saying is - the wrong billing might happen during a > small time window. If this is the only concern, we must live with that. > We will place the responsibility on the privileged persons to > establish their privilege. When they come in and say their status has > changed we will pull in the latest privileged list and update the > existing patient records. If they forget to do so, they have to go > through normal billing. > I don't feel there is a way out. If you have any concerns please let me > know. I will have a rethink too. Thanks for your advice. > > > > > I believe that you should integrate all the information of the patient into the GNU Health instance (demographics, different IDs, ... ). For what I see, having that extra legacy DB will create issues and extra work.
All the best, -- GNU Health : The Free Health and Hospital Information System http://health.gnu.org Twitter: @gnuhealth
