On 30 Sep 18:31, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > El 30/09/14 a les 14:54, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > >On 29 Sep 17:40, Cédric Krier wrote: > >>>On 29 Sep 17:25, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > >>>> >So will be great if you can explain which is the correct usage of the > >>>> >tools, > >>>> >as it's not clear on my side. > >>> > >>>It will be much more simple if you explain what you are trying to do. > >To be clear, the actual behavior (not update planned date earlier) is > >there to overcome this issue: > > > > - I create an incoming shipment because I receive goods > > - I select some moves to put on it > > - I save (without current behavior planned date are updated) > > - I find I selected a wrong one so I unselect and save > > > >Without the current behavior, we will get the wrongly selected moves > >planned for now which will break all the supply chain without any notice > >to the user. So we try to always be pessimistic for evey incoming just > >like we try to be optimistic for outgoing. > > Ok, understood your point. But From your comment in [1]: "Incoming shipment > must be created when receiving the goods", which is the objective to plan a > shipment (and their moves) that must be received now? > > What i try to point is: Maybe it's simpler to remove the planned date of the > supplier shipment and manage the moves planned date directly from moves (as > you suggested in this thread). If done this way, there is no issue to > overcome.
Both options are not antagonist. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgp72k_DWfyZC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
