On 01 Oct 11:10, Raimon Esteve wrote:
> 2014-10-01 10:26 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>:
> 
> > On 01 Oct 09:55, Raimon Esteve wrote:
> > > We talk to search/filter in current model:
> > >
> > > a- a field don't available in tree view
> > >
> > > For example, Search/filter parties by two o more categories in Party
> > (party
> > > in [])
> >
> > The proposed solution doesn't solve that. So wrong solution.
> > And this could be achieved by improving the «Parties by Category»
> > tree_opne action to work with more than one selected record.
> >
> 
> In this example is filter more than one category. "Parties by Category"
> menu is one category
> 
> It's an example.

So you don't read my answer at all.

> > a- search in current model and add other condition to other model related:
> > >
> > > For example, search all shipments out from yestarday to today and
> > contains
> > > product code "xxxx".
> >
> > Idem.
> > And this could probably solved by searching on moves.
> >
> 
> No solve searching on moves. For example like to send an email to customer
> or print a shipment report. Don't send an email ech move. Send email by
> shipment. You need filter/search by shipment
> 
> It's an example to search/find rows by models related.

So what? I'm boring answer you about obvious.

> >
> > > Those conditions, user don't do it to search/find.
> > >
> > > IMHO, search filter in Tryton is easy and nice, but not powerfull.
> >
> > And your solution neither.
> >
> > But mine for your particular cases solve the problem.
> > So yes Tryton is not magically prefect, many details need to be fixed
> > like the relates or some views. But it can only be unified if you follow
> > the main principle instead of fighting against.
> >
> 
> I think there are more people to do search filter more flexible ;)

Please in English?

-- 
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: [email protected]
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

Attachment: pgp0vhQe71ScY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to