On 30 Dec 13:58, Jean C wrote: > 2014-12-30 13:00 GMT+01:00 Vincent Bastos <[email protected]>: > > > I am not saying that they are correct, but I curious to hear people's > > thoughts around this topic. > > > Names are tough : > http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/
I even think we should remove the required on the name of Party. We have code for this case. > That said, we had the same requirements from our (french speaking) clients. > We dealt with it by adding a first_name field, using the name field for the > last name, and overriding get_rec_name to display both if needed. The best solution is to convince your customer that their requirements are wrong. A possible generic solution will be to use a list of type of name (maybe a Dict field) that could be used to autofill the real name with maybe some sort of formatting depending on some context like the language, the primary country etc. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
