On 23 Feb 21:11, Chris Larsen wrote: > Dear All, > The lack of a default configuraqtion file is kind of acceptable, though a > bit inconvenient.
It is because trytond doesn't need configuration. > What does not make sense is the lack of documentation of all the options > that are applicable to the configuration file - I am, for instance, aawre > that the LDAP setup has been shifted from the GUI to the configuration > file. Yes and it is documented: http://doc.tryton.org/3.4/modules/ldap_authentication/doc/index.html#configuration > Likewise, other options will evolve over time. This link > (http://doc.tryton.org/3.4/trytond/doc/topics/configuration.html) barely > explains the configuration file option, and hence does not help. So please help us to improve it. > I think that Tryton should stick to the time-honoured practice of having a > trytond.config.sample file made available, which is documented and > commented, and users can copy it and modify their working version. Doing > such a sample file is actually less work than writing extensive wiki > documentation. We should make it easier, not harder, for users to use this > splendid ERP infrastructure! It is not possible due to the modularity of the configuraton. And providing a .sample is not necessary the holy grail of good practice, look for example at mercurial. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
