Am Montag, 17. August 2015, 10:05:17 schrieb Cédric Krier:

> > > So the idea is to have a quite simple object with only:
> > >     - order number
> > >     - employee
> > >     - shop
> > >     - lines (product, quantity, unit price (tax included), price)
> > >     
> > >       The price will come from a new list price tax included on the
> > >       product.
> > 
> > Why a new/different price list?
> > As we need to show the tax amount (by tax category) on a sales slip, and
> > for the keeping it simple, why not reuse the existing sales price list?
> I'm not sure about what you are talking but if it is about the "list
> price" field on the product, we can not use this one because it is tax
> excluded.

And whats the point in adding up the tax internally? It has to be collected 
anyway, as confirmed by Korbinian
 
> > >     - stock moves from shop location to customer
> > 
> > I think in general the goods issue is sufficient, a delivery process is
> > not
> > required. We just may need the address of the customer, e.g. for a food
> > delivery service or similar, when the customer does not pick it up in the
> > shop, but it is being delivered.
> 
> If there is a delivery then it is a shipment.

I feel for a POS it would be overengineered to have a shipment process. 
Usually the customer walks away with the goods.
 
> > > But this default workflow could be modified by requesting an invoice, if
> > > so the party will be requested. This request should be possible on
> > > already paid POS order.
> > > Of course the account move generated by the POS order should be the same
> > > as the one generated by the invoice.
> > > 
> > > The design should be take into account such possible extension:
> > >     - using a wizard to add lines
> > >     - allow to request a shipment (included back-order)
> > >     - support for sale_extra and sale_promotion
> > >     - fidelity card
> > > 
> > > The design should not care about price list, nor grouping modules.
> > > 
> > > I think it could be the foundation for more complex POS using specific
> > > UI (like a web base).
> > > 
> > > Did I forget something? Or do you see a use case that could not be
> > > supported?
> > 
> > As said, I think we need a sales slip in any case, with the legally
> > required info: Selling party, Tax number, items, VAT amount per category
> > (full/reduced VAT).
> 
> I'm not sure about the Taxes, I just get one sale slip in front and I
> have no tax information at all. And that sounds logical for me otherwise
> it will be exactly like an invoice.

Reply via email to