Cédric, Yes it is widely used - it is the basis for oioubl in scandanvian countries, it is
I already wrote about UBL in 2008. I have been working with UBL specs since 2006. I have worked since 1996 with EDIFACT. Is UBL better - it is based on XML and is largely adopted now in Europe. http://www.danga.biz/2008/07/ubl-de-europese-communicatiestandaard.html regards Danny Op zaterdag 22 augustus 2015 10:10:04 UTC+2 schreef Cédric Krier: > > Hi, > > I discovered this language: > https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ubl > > Do you know this standard? Is it widely used? > Is it a better/simpler one than EDIFACT? > > Thanks, > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: [email protected] <javascript:> > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ >
