On 09.11.2015 20:18, Cédric Krier wrote: > On 2015-11-09 19:34, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote: >> Am 09.11.2015 18:45 schrieb "Cédric Krier" <[email protected]>: >>> On 2015-11-09 18:21, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote: >>>>> I don't agree, negative amount is a credit note not a cancellation. >>>>> The cancellation of an invoice is managed the cancellation move. This >> is >>>>> the only way to ensure that the cancellation is really a cancellation. >>>>> The amounts can not be modified, the invoice can only be cancelled >> once >>>>> etc. >>>>> >>>> Could you please again define for me the credit note you are talking >>>> about? What makes your credit note different from an invoice? >>> A "credit note" in the future design is just an invoice with an amount >>> negative >> Can you please explain me the business case behind such a credit note? I >> ask this because i think that we are talking from different things and i >> really want to understand your plans as i think that the changes you plan >> are really important. > The usual usage of credit note is to correct mistakes made on invoice or > to cancel an invoice because it has no reason to exist. > This is because in many countries cancelling invoices are not allowed. Ok. Now we are talking. Everything is clear for me now. What you call a credit note is a cancelation for me and the cancelation you talk about is just a special case of your credit note for me.
This also explains why you do not care about the self-billing boolean as it is not part of your concept. We can keep it out as it is not really important for the removal of the invoice/credit note type. I will try to answer your last posts again as you now solved my misunderstanding.
