On 2016-12-04 07:59, Richard PALO wrote: > As a side note, seems a bit heavy if tryton needs to read all previous > years to get starting balance (I most certinaly hope not).
It is not heaving and indeed it is even a speedup. > This is one of the benefits of having an annual opening balance as is > traditionnally done (not to mention it expressly provides for independent > accounting years, a fundamental principle in accounting). This is not the design chosen by Tryton because it breaks any attempt to track receivable or payable. > In any event, one must not be myopic as to the number of fiscal years. Do not understand. > > > 3. with movements (in the period) > > > > This could probably be done by creating a Function field that returns > > the number of moves. > > > > > seems there should probably also be an option simply to include or not > > > the 'start balance' as well > > > > Do you mean that you want to have a column with debit - credit ? > > > > Well, for a balance report, it is useful to have either extra column for > initial balance, or both debit and credit, > but this is probably a simple matter of report formatting which could be site > specific. For me, it is not necessary on trial balance because the goal is to show that the accounts are balanced so if start and and balance sum equals 0 and debit equals credit sum, it is OK. > For GL it is typically an additional line prior to the moves for the period. There is already. > > > while suppressing the non-intuitive behaviour currently of 4.x selecting > > > by default only the first account. > > > > That's default behaviour to select the first record, I do not think it > > will change. > > > > For a report, this is not intuitive though perhaps a 'selection only' option > that limits output to what is > selected on the screen could continue to provide current behaviour... It is better to have always the same behaviour in the all application. Any action applies on what is selected. > But have you tried to select only used > accounts (say 200-300) out of 1200 in e.g. the French accounting plan? Use the filters. > > > There seems to miss as well a means to be able to select only > > > non-reconciled entries (relative to the > > > accounting year), which appears to be a crucial need expressed by > > > accountants and legal auditors. > > > > I do not understand exactly what you mean. For me, there is no sense to > > care about non-reconciled per fiscal year. Also I do not see the point > > to care about them individually, we have the Aged Balance for that. > > > > Balance is not interesting for this, although auxiliary balance/GL is also > necessary, > what is expected is a GL *detailing* only non-reconciled entries, typically > for year-end > (or periodic situation) closing. What is the point? It is useless in Tryton because non-deferral lines stay. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20161204113016.GE71015%40tetsuo.
