вторник, 2 мая 2017 г., 22:40:10 UTC+3 пользователь Cédric Krier написал: > > On 2017-04-28 02:54, 'Artem Braga' via tryton wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I wanted to ask what is the key process difference between Anglo-Saxon > and > > Continental Account Stock Method? There is module documentation for both > > modules and stock methods here: http://doc.tryton.org/4.2/ > > > > But the following things are not clear from this documentation: > > > > 1. Does Anglo-Saxon stock method can create account moves based on > > supplier/customer stock shipments without invoice, while Continental > stock > > method can create account moves based on supplier/customer invoices > without > > shipments? > > No, they both create account moves on shipments. > > > 2. Do both stock methods use cost of goods sold account for customer > sales > > transactions? > > No, only anglo-saxon use the cost of goods sold account. > > > 3. What are other key process differences between these two stock > methods? > > Indeed anglo-saxon is based on continental so they both keep perpetual > stock accounting. > But anglo-saxon also keep the cost of good sold account up to date on > invoice posting. > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: [email protected] <javascript:> > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ >
Thanks for explanation, Cedrik So, anglo-saxon creates = debit- cost of sales and credit stock= entry when goods are sold. What entries are created by continental method upon sale of goods? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/3654ffcd-58be-47fa-b0d5-f69fbe3e8e2d%40googlegroups.com.
