Having used APCUPSD for quit awhile, I found NUT to be a much more involved and complex application. For my needs, 3 servers on 1 UPS I found APCUPSD to be more than sufficient. Compile the source - it's not terribly complicated.
Stephen On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 15:09, Tobias Bu�mann wrote: > Hi list, > after reading about apcupsd, I tryed to compare it to NUT. (which is > described on > http://doc.trustix.org/cgi-bin/trustixdoc.cgi?UninterruptiblePowerSupply) > Unfortunately I wasn't able to find out which one is 'the better product' > using google. Which one do you prefer - apcupsd or nut? Is there a > comparison of them somewhere? > > regards, > Tobias > > > Ari�n Huisken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I have used the RH rpm's from apcupsd.org on Trustix with no > >>> problems. > >> > >> Which version of RH do you mean? And which version of Trustix are > >> you running? > >> I am running TSL 2.1 and I tried apcupsd-usb-3.10.16-1.i386 rpm's for > >> RH9, FC1, FC3 > >> with no success... > >> > >> Still gives me this message: > >> > >> error: failed dependencies: > >> gd >= 2.0 is needed by apcupsd-usb-3.10.16-1 > >> > >> I have installed libgd-2.0.28-1je and libgd-devel-2.0.28-1je, but > >> still with no luck... > > > > A long time ago I downloaded apcupsd-3.8.6-1jr.i586.rpm and still use > > it on TSL > > 2.0 and 2.2. I know it's not the latest version, but it works on a > > base TSL installation, no extra packages needed. I thougt it was a RH > > rpm, but i'm not sure... > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tsl-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > tsl-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss > > _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
