> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:25:37 +0100
> From: Joel Merrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: TSL 3.0
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Brunello Ivan wrote:
> 
>> Just 3 (more) feature requests:
>> 
>> - Reiser4
>>  I have a bunch of TSL servers, and they all use reiserfs
>>  (this is a major plus against e.g. Fedora, which does its best to
>>  hide reiser features) reiser4 seems to be even better than reiser3,
>>  and it is compatible w/ kernel 2.6.x even better, having it as a
>> further alternative during install 
>> 
>> 
> 
> It's still quite in it's infancy yet, although having said that I've
> been running it on my desktop for months now and it's not died once. I
> doubt it's good enough for production however, just yet.
> 
IMHO having it as an option could not harm.
There is people confortable w/ ext2 (not ext3).

>> - clustering sw
>>  heartbeat & drdb (or, even better, openGFS) would be a good addon.
>> Perhaps contrib? 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Clustering � la OpenMOSIX, Beowulf or OpenSSI would be great!
> 
I'm oriented toward easier implementation.
I think background of OpenMOSIX & OpenSSI is well above the average Linux 
administrator.
But, why not.


One last request:

PLEASE KEEP IT INTO A SINGLE CD :-)

One single CD means carefully selected software, better management of security 
issue, and a leaner install.
The current list of packages is well above the average needs for most servers.
Oh, yes, we miss asterisk and nagios, but all databases, postfix, 2 mail 
servers and even RRDTool are there.
And, after all, there is a wonderful Contrib area.


My two eurocents.

Ivan


_______________________________________________
tsl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss

Reply via email to