On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:10 +0200, Matthias Subik wrote: > oh, and if anybody tries to update gcc-c++-runtime, and somethings > goes wrong, the system is partly hosed, since the rpm binary wouldn't > work anymore to restore the old one from rpm. > found that one the hard way ;) > so I'm asking for inclusion of the above.
This specific problem might be solved by providing an rpm-static binary (like the bash-static you sometimes see for embedded or single user mode) to ease recovery in emergency situations. I, personally, am not sure how one would go about building this. -- Andy Bakun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
