Christian Haugan Toldnes, 22.08.2005 09:26:
> Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote:
> 
> 
>>But it just struck me that I bet the reason TSL no longer ships a
>>-firewall kernel is because they have competing non-free products.
>> 
>>
> 
> 
> Wrong. The commercial products all uses the included kernels. We dropped 
> the -firewall kernel because it did not give us anything useful any 
> longer. All the functionality included in the -firewall kernel at that 
> time was merged into the normal kernel.

Great. Would you consider a -firewall kernel with some of the suggested 
modifications?
I'm in need of more traffic-shaping abilities, plus some of the more 
advanced iptables-patches. I'd be happy to provide a wishlist.
_______________________________________________
tsl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss

Reply via email to