as I read the policy, the next .2 will become super stable. 3.0 and 3.1 are the steps to become stable. compared with any other distro I use the wording would be 3.0 is released as a marketing release is, but if you run a 24-7 99.9% server, install 2.2, since there is a 'feature frozen' tree, which won't change.
I have 2.2 for name server, and if a customer asks me about 2.6 kernel, or just one power supply, they get 3.0, since if they have time to change a failing power supply, they have time to setup a 2.2 backup in case something fails with the 3.0 server. I use 3.0 for web and mail services already, and it works great. but the old 2.2 mailserver will be in place until the end-of-life for swup upgrades. the hardware is fine, it is cooled, and will be there for the time as smtp /amavis/clamav/ webmail. just my two cents. matthias On 25.09.2005, at 15:54, Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> ehlo, >> >> i wonder if theres still anyone using tsl 2.2... >> seems that you all swithed to tsl 3... >> > > I got 1 server left on TSL2.2, the rest is now 3.0. I upgraded my > servers because TSL3 included packages I've been maintaining manually. > > >> hmm... inst 2.2 the stable version ??? >> > > Yes it is. I think the devs stated that whenever 3.1 is out that will > become the new stable. > _______________________________________________ > tsl-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
