Alain Fauconnet wrote:
> Hello readers,
> 
> I've posted this to linux-kernel because I thought that it was more
> appropriate, but it seemingly has got lost in the noise.
> 
> I'll repost here, hoping for a clue. It's probably not specific to TSL
> though. I also realise that's a pretty dirty hack over TSL 2.2.
> Unfortunately I can't give TSL 3.0 a try on this box: it will be used
> for full production work in a few days and our production standard O/S
> is TSL 2.2. Kernel 2.6 was tried out to improve NFS client performance
> (it's client of a NetApp NAS). No kind of "support" on this problem
> expected of course, but just in case that rings a bell, here it is:
> 
> This is an IBM xSeries dual-P3 1.0Ghz server box with an IBM ServeRAID
> 4Mx controller and 3 * IBM 18 Gb SCSI hotswap disks.
> Base O/S is Trustix 2.2, manually updated with a 2.6.13 kernel built
> from source and a mkinitrd-4.1.18-2 RPM
> stolen from FC3 because TSL 2.2's mkinitrd can't handle .ko modules.
> 
> After upgrading to kernel 2.6.13, the machine stops at boot during
> initrd processing. After much head-scratching I've figured out that
> the "mkdevices /dev" command in the "init" script of the initrd was
> looping.
> Hand-editing the init script like this:

toss out the initrd, compile everything you need into the kernel, 
disable everything you don't need.

initrds are fine for generic kernels that are supposed to boot on a wide 
array of boxes from the same build. once you build your own kernel, the 
point of an initrd disappears (imo)

Cheers,
-- 
Morten
_______________________________________________
tsl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss

Reply via email to