On 06.03.2006, at 09:47, Alain Fauconnet wrote: > > ... > I know, I know... that would be my approach too eventually, but > inquiring minds wants to know. After all if people have taken the pain > writing drivers supporting this kind of RAID, they must have had some > reasons doing so, right?
mmmm, maybe employed by a vendor, reseller? my experience is that kernel raid is more well tested, and even hotpluggable if you get the controller to reinit after harddisk change (some ide controllers do that if you remove the ide module and reinsert .... so as long I'm not using (insert brand raid5 risc processor based controller here) I would go for kernel raid. have fun, and don't judge by market presence ;) m _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
