Hi Oystein! Wednesday 06, at 02:24:59 PM you wrote:
> * [Christian Haugan Toldnes] > > > If it's not picked up by the community soon, it will simply vanish, and > > later releases of TSL will either have the same old semi-broken swup, or > > migrate to some other solution, like apt perhaps. > > apt-rpm for TSL wouldn't be so bad. Would miss some features, but possibly > gain others. Repository levels would go away, but apt pinning could fix > that (if that works in the rpm-backed version of apt). I believe gpg > integration in apt has improved a bit during the last 6-7 years, too :) apt-rpm is very slow (not so slow as yum, but much slower than swup and native apt-dpkg). Mostly is due how it's cache working - just a heap of rpm headers nor db structure nor search optimization. If someone replace this crap to some db-aware cache and cleanup the code it will be great solution. But only for one-arch system because biarch is broken too ;) -- WBR et al.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
