Eric Noulard wrote: > Hi All, > [...] > > The question from Robert (HDV) was: > >> Do you mean that the c variant of the client side of the >> xmlrpc interface is not meant to be >> used, but rather the plain old rpc variant? > [...] > > Stephane did modify code and CMakeLists.txt accordingly. > The client-side XMLRPC code in C langage is in the source > but as far as I know, uncompiled and unused.
You're right, moreover it's far from being up to date as it didn't followed the evolutions of the XMLRPC server contract, as far as I known. > > I think we may remove client side XMLRPC code in C alltogether > because no one is compiling it and may be no one have time > to maintain it because it of no use. > > Your (all of you) opinions are welcomed. > The question is: > Should we remove the consumer side XMLRPC C code from > TSP source. > Does anybody have a use case for this C XMLRPC channel ? Steph _______________________________________________ Tsp-devel mailing list Tsp-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tsp-devel
