2008/7/3 Jerome Arbez-Gindre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/7/3 Eric Noulard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> If this is OK for you and other I may commit this, the patch is >> harmful in the default >> case since it does change the previous behavior. > > Your solution is more elegant and flexible than mine (and do not force > to have Windows sectarism ;-). > So this is OK for me.
I've just checked-in the proposal. I didn't wait too much for feedback because the change is harmful however is somebody find a flaws in the solution let us know. >> this is a subscriber-only lists which means that the sender >> address you use to send message to the list should subscribe >> to the list. >> If is not feasible for you I may add the sender address to the >> OK sender list of the list but I would rather avoid this. >> Moreover if you send message may be some of you would be interested >> by receiving those messages :=) > > The sender of our tool can't receive e-mails... ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > In fact I will personally receive the Hudson's mails and do the needed > fix on the kernel module. > It's up to you to decide if the mail on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > are useful or not. Continuous integration is definitely useful for TSP. I have just added the [EMAIL PROTECTED] to accepted non-member list of the tsp-integration list, go ahead and let Hudson send its message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note however that the list subscribers will receive the sent message and that the list is public and archived: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/tsp-testintegration/ -- Erk _______________________________________________ Tsp-devel mailing list Tsp-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tsp-devel
