Hi
> > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:18:49 -0700 > From: Andrew Lentvorski <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dccp] UDP encaps for SCTP and SCCP > To: Lars Eggert <[email protected]> > Cc: DCCP working group <[email protected]>, TSV Area <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 5/18/10 12:37 AM, Lars Eggert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the discussion has touched on lots of things related to UDP > encaps, but I haven't seen anything I'd call consensus on the > question below. I'd therefore like to ask folks to > specifically state which option they support: > > > > (1) do one SCTP-specific and one DCCP-specific UDP encaps > > (2) do one generic UDP encaps that can be used with both > > (3) do neither (don't do any sort of UDP encaps for SCTP and DCCP) > > 1 or 2. However, SCTP can go hang. It's a protocol in > search of a problem, IMO. For what it is worth, SCTP is used in Evolved Packet Core which is the main component in 3GPP System Arctitecture Evolution. I don't remember which interface but it is anyway a strong use case for SCTP. /Ingemar
