Hi, I'm updating the working copy in response to the LC reviews. See below for how I'm addressing things.
On 2011-1-19, at 22:54, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP] wrote: > A few small comments which I don't think should be blocking are: > > 1 - on page 11, in section 6, "near-infinite" is a bit of an exaggeration Changed to "very many". > 2 - on page 16, there's a typo: "MUST accompanied" should be "MUST be > accompanied" Was already fixed in our working copy. > 3 - on page 17, it may be a good idea to be clear whether the Assignee can be > an individual (not just an organization) Fixed. (Alexey had commented on that, too.) > 4 - on page 17, Contact is defined as a person, but using the IESG as the > Contact makes it a group (not a "person"); it might be good to clarify > Contact as a person or group of people I actually think we want the contact to be *one* person. I propose to fix this by making the IETF Chair the contact person for IETF registrations assigned to the IESG. > 5 - on page 17, in the Reference definition, it may be good to qualify the > description of broadcast/multicast/anycast use by the protocol as being > IP-layer broadcast/multicast/anycast to disambiguate from possible > application-layer mechanisms for these that might be used Fixed. Thanks, Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
