David McGrew <[email protected]> writes: >I have a hard time understanding what the goals of the I-D are relative to >the TCP standard. The draft says "Standards Track"; would Experimental be >more appropriate?
+1. I've got it set aside for next week when I may have a bit more time to look at it, but my first reaction was "why?". I understand it's always fun to dream up a new crypto protocol (Ferguson and Schneier wrote a whole book on it), but... why? It definitely seems like an Experimental to me, not Standards-track. Peter.
