On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Wesley Eddy <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is very helpful to hear. This sounds like 2309bis to me, since > (a) is basically what 2309 already says, and I see b and c as basically > incorporating things that have happened since then (ECN and learning > that auto-tuning is good). Do you see it as an update to 2309? Basically. It could be usefully written to replace 2309, incorporating much of the existing text and adding what we have learned in the 20 years intervening.
