Hi all,

As promised a few more words about this part of the TSVAREA session in Vancouver:

The intention of this "Evolution of IETF Transport Protocols" part is to test the waters if the IETF transport protocols are 'on track' of what is needed by today's hosts and applications -- and what's happening in the network.

There are a number of activities around, see below, that propose changes to, for instance, TCP, and also new transport protocol proposals. There is also an on-going collaboration between the Transport Area and the HTTPbis working group with respect to HTTP/2.0.

We will tackle a few of the proposals in the session, but there is no restricition to those. Here they are in no particular order:

- The Saratoga protocol & interesting things out of this for the evolution of transport protocols (Presenter: Wes Eddy)
- Functional decomposition of the transport layer (Presenter: Jana Iyengar)
- TCP Crypt (Presenter: Andre Bittau)
- IETF-43 Requirements for Unicast Transport/Sessions (ruts) bof (Presenter: Spencer Dawkins)


Not well that there is also a presentation about the QUIC protocol just before this discussion.


Note even better:
The session does not need to deliver answers to any question that comes up, but is solely intended as a starting point for further activites, if needed, or just to note that we have talked about it, but everything is just fine and we can carry on.

Thank you,

  Martin

On 10/23/2013 09:12 AM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
Dear all,

We would like to give time to the Transport Area to discuss any
potential need to evolve the IETF transport protocols.

There are a number of proposals discussed in the IETF and outside of the
IETF on changing parts of TCP (e.g. laminar TCP [1]), reusing parts of
TCP (e.g., TCP Minion [2]), completely new transport protocols (e.g.
QUIC [3]), and also discussions about the congestion control approach to
be used (e.g., delay-based [4], LEDBAT [5]).

(We are fully aware that this list of proposals is incomplete)

Spencer and I are planning a slot in the TSVAREA session at IETF 88 in
Vancouver to discuss this topic.

More information to come soon.

Let Spencer and me know at [email protected] if you are interested
in contributing actively to the session.

Thanks,

   Spencer and Martin, your TSV ADs.

References
[1] https://developers.google.com/speed/protocols/tcp-laminar
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iyengar-minion-concept
[3]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqsQx7rFV-ev2jRFUoVD34/edit?pli=1

[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rmcat/charter/
[5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ledbat/charter/

Reply via email to