Hi all,
After the feedback received in the BoF in Berlin, we have updated the TCM-TF charter and the two drafts. We have tried to solve all the problems raised during the session. Our plan is to request a new BoF in London next March, so we would like to know your opinion about these two questions: 1. Is the new, reduced scope of TCM-TF suitable to form a working group? 2. We would like to kindly ask people who think that a TCM-TF Working group should be formed, to come forward and send an e-mail to the [email protected] mailing list stating it. This feedback will allow us to get a better idea of the convenience of a BoF. The new charter is here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00465.html This is the old one (presented in Berlin): http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00368.html In these links you can see the differences between the new versions of the drafts and the old ones: <http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf-06.txt&url2=dr aft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf-05.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf-06.txt&url2=dra ft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf-05.txt http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-02.txt <http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-02.txt&u rl2=draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-01.txt> &url2=draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf-01.txt The main improvements are: - TCP optimization has been removed - The classification of the scenarios has been refined and improved. Some of them have been removed - A section about energy consumption has been added to the main draft - A reference to the potential problem of the MTU and packet loss has been added - The problem of the added delays is studied in detail in the second draft - The improvements of the charter are summarized here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00466.html Best regards, Jose
