On Mar 13, 2014, at 11:50 PM, Eggert, Lars <[email protected]> wrote: > have there been any substantive changes addressing the lack of congestion > control? If I recall correctly, that was the critical issue in the past. (The > diff at the URL below doesn't seem to do that.)
The draft refers to RFC 5405, and indicates that while the specification doesn’t identify an upper bound on loss, any given implementation should. For a single-packet-outstanding protocol, what would you like to see in congestion control? At most, I could imagine a comment on exponential backoff...
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
