Tom,

Do you have in mind such use cases when you referred to the "stateful firewalls 
model"?

One of the problems with stateful firewalls (as well as transparent
proxies) is that they require all packets for a flow to consistently
traverse the same middlebox device. The middlebox is not addressed by
the packet, so the assumed requirement is that packets for the flow go
though the same network node by virtue of routing.

The proposed converter has one IP address and a reserved port number. Packets follow norm routing path towards this address.

For a firewall in a
single-homed site to the Internet this works because the firewall is
the only egress/ingress point to the network. If a site is
multi-homed, then the hope is that routing of packets in both
directions will go through the same point. But there is absolutely no
requirement that network layer packets for a flow are always routed
the same way, and if routing does change and packets need to flow
through different points the session breaks. >
If I'm reading the draft correctly, then it has the same property of
maintaining transport state in the network so it implies the same
requirement that all packets for a flow follow the same path.
Personally,  would find it ironic that a a protocol to allow muli-path
transport would require the network layer to be single path.

The motivation for the proposed converters is that the destination does not support MPTCP. To enable the client to leverage the benefits of MPTCP (e.g. in the access networks) the MPTCP connection is terminated on the converter. The client uses the different paths between it and the converter.


Olivier

--

------------------------------
DISCLAIMER.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to