Hi everybody,

I started a new position as Ericsson Research this month. With Magnus 
Westerlund taking over AD responsibilities from Spencer during the Prague 
IETF-104 meeting, this will put us into a situation where both transport ADs 
will have the same affiliation.

First, I would like to quickly mention that it wasn’t as easy as I was hoping 
to find a new position in industry that would support me in my AD role and I am 
really happy that this finally worked out and I can serve till the end of my 
term in 2020.

Coming back to the situation where we will have two ADs with the same 
affiliation in the same area. This situation is of course not desirable and 
doesn’t happen very often, however, it is not the first time. I informed the 
NomCom and IAB about my affiliation change as soon as I was able to, which was 
in January. At this time the NomCom already prepared to announce the selected 
candidates but had not announced them yet.

During IETF-104, Magnus will take over Spencer’s groups as the new responsible 
AD, including those groups that have active wg documents that I co-author, 
while I will keep my responsibilities for the same groups I have so far. We 
believe there is no direct conflict in managing these groups as neither my 
documents nor Ericsson with any other documents is one of the main drivers or 
contributors in these groups. A situation where at least one author and the 
responsible AD have the same affiliation is less rare and usually not 
necessarily seen as a conflict of interest, as least for wg documents where 
other individuals have been involved in the process and consensus was built by 
the whole group. However, whenever we get into a situation where a potential 
conflict or bias could be assumed, we will ask for the help of other members in 
the IESG, e.g. by shepherding a conflicted document by another AD outside the 
transport area if necessary. Still, if you think there is a conflict or bias 
that we overlook or are not handling appropriately, please talk with us, the 
rest of the IESG, or,
alternatively, the IETF chair and we will handle this carefully.

Last, I also would like to take the opportunity to thank Spencer for this great 
service in keeping the transport area running. It was a pleasure working with 
him and he provided important contributions to the IESG with his experience and 
expertise. Gladly, we will have a great successor with Magnus, who has also 
already a lot experienced as AD and in the transport area in general. So, big 
thanks Spencer and welcome Magnus!

Mirja

Reply via email to