Hello Transport Area,

I hope everyone had a good IETF 114. I sure did.

In particular, I appreciated the level of engagement at the TSVAREA meeting
when we discussed a potential Congestion Control Working Group.

Meeting video here: https://youtu.be/TSpK8C0DqDc?t=619
Mailing list thread starts here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/S0q0WyRBvqHEopqLz34G3b0tsKA/
and lastly, the straw-man proposed charter:
https://github.com/martinduke/congestion-control-charter

The main takeaways:
(1) Most participants supported this work, but a few think that
standards-track congestion controls are mostly a waste of time and resources
(2) There appears to be enough interest in actively authoring/editing the
main documents to make progress
(3) While the main proposed deliverables are process-oriented and
non-controversial, there is disagreement on what is "in" or "out" of
working group scope (loss recovery, AQM, multipath, etc)

Now that the ADs have rallied the area, it is time to hand off refinement
to the community. *We need at least two volunteers* to complete the process
of gathering consensus on a charter. I hope that a rapid tempo of
discussion on this list could avoid the need for a BoF. However, If a BoF
is needed to reach this consensus, these proponents would be expected to
chair it, presumably in London. These proponents would presumably
eventually either become working group chairs or edit the deliverables, but
volunteering now is not a commitment to either.

Though a lower priority than finding these volunteers, we would also
welcome individual drafts addressing any of the deliverables listed in the
draft charter.

Please email Zahed and me if you're interested.

Thanks,
Martin

Reply via email to