now everything is done via rpm specfile, setup.py (and/or makefile) does 
nothing.
that's what i want to achieve: make specfile stupid simple and setup.py more 
complex, to have tuna more friendly for rpm-less distros.
and that specfile is useless in age of tito, koji, copr and mock (what's more, 
stored in bad place).
if so, i vote for tuna.spec.in without changelog part, modified only when some 
new file will be added.

best regards
jiri kastner

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 03:07:00PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 30/01/14 12:51, Jiri Kastner wrote:
> > hi, i plan remove rpm folder in all packages and also makefile and
> > move all setup/install tasks to setup.py. therefore all patches
> > which are changing rpm folder and specfile are not going to be
> > accepted :)
> > 
> 
> Just thinking aloud ... Is this so clever?  What is the problem with
> having the RPM directory and spec file there?
> 
> I would however, consider spec files shipped in a project to be more
> "distro neutral".  And then rpmbuild can be used on other
> non-RHEL/Fedora platforms easily, such as SuSE and Mandrake/Mandriva,
> to mention a few.  I think of rpmbuild -t{a,b,s} <tarball> in particular.
> 
> For official inclusion in each of the distros, a different spec file
> will most likely needed, but this spec file can then serve as a nice
> template to start with.
> 
> 
> Just my 2 cents.
> 
> 
> - --
> kind regards,
> 
> David Sommerseth
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlLqXIEACgkQIIWEatLf4HcN3ACeIrq9B67fsaNuiB6rPNRyJA0C
> +iUAni/RH+KyOP1V/IQ9chqpRxDmGvkL
> =wQ7s
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tuna-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/tuna-devel

Attachment: pgp3t76vGl5FK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
tuna-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/tuna-devel

Reply via email to