On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 20:36:40 -0500, Mike Shal wrote: > Tup has some support for response files when groups are used, but I don't > think that helps in this particular case where it is just a long > command-lines. I filed an issue for it: > https://github.com/gittup/tup/issues/165 > > Using ^r sounds ok to me, though it would probably be better if we could > just know the limit in Windows and handle it before we try to execute the > command (either by creating a response file when possible, or reporting the > error in tup).
This KB article[1] seems to say it is 2047 for versions older than XP and 8191 for newer versions. > Is there a case where we'd want to use a response file even if the > length of the command-line doesn't require it? Not that I can think of, but I don't know for sure. FWIW, CMake-generated Ninja files are currently all-or-nothing for response files (though a property could be set on a source file or target to do so instead I suppose). --Ben [1]http://support.microsoft.com/kb/830473 -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
