On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Rico Beier <[email protected]> wrote:
> But think of the following problem: >> > You have an input file, that is splitted by command_1 into different files > (either part_1 ... part_n depending on content; and all these files shall > be processed further; OR filename.out, filename.aux, and only in some cases > filename.add) ... When doing more than one command_1 you cannot exactly > define output files, because the definition shall be exactly. Either it > says "detected other output" or "loutput missing"... So it would be nice to > define outputs with wildcards and optional outputs that may not be created > in every case... > > > Yeah, this is difficult to do in tup currently. For the second case, you could always just create an empty 'filename.add' in those cases where the program doesn't create it, but splitting up a file into multiple parts depending on the content & runtime execution will require some changes to how tup handles unexpected output files. -Mike -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
