On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Bourgond Aries <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would it be possible for tup to automatically deduce input and output for > a :-rule? Would this be useful or detrimental, and why? > > Yes, this is one of the main features of tup. You still have to list files generated by another rule as inputs so that tup can get the ordering correct on the first build, and outputs are still required to be listed explicitly at the moment, though I'm not sure if that's a fundamental requirement that can't be fixed in the future or not. -Mike -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
