(exposing my Windows ignorance): Is there an analog of suid that tup could use so that it could create these without admin-prompting every run, or is this simply not a good path to try to go down on Windows?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:48 PM Ben Boeckel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 20:37:13 +0000, Pat Pannuto wrote: > > Modern windows does have support for symlinks (aka junctions) and hard > > links, though I've never worked with them. Could be an interesting > > experiment to try? > > Needs admin privs to create them. Basically, to ensure that old Windows > apps aren't tripped up by the different behaviors caused by them. > > Also, junctions and symlinks are different beasts (junction is closer to > mount while symlinks can't be relative and point outside the drive > letter). > > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365006%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > > --Ben > > -- > -- > tup-users mailing list > email: [email protected] > unsubscribe: [email protected] > options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "tup-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
