Pe 23 mai 2017 7:14 PM, "Mike Shal" <[email protected]> a scris:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Eddy Petrișor <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem I had was on such a compiler where the temporary files had > totally random filenames. > > This was a no go for me. Are you in a similar situation? What kind of temporary files are these? Some programs, like ar, write to a temporary file for the output, but then move that randomly named temporary file to the non-randomly named output file. Tup tracks this and disregards the temporary file as an output. However, if you run a program that writes to a different random file each time you run it (not as an intermediate file, but as an output), that is by definition Some temporary files which are in the end removed. The tool keeps some of its interim stuff in them. not an idempotent build step. It's possible tup could support this by allowing unknown outputs if the Tupfile has a <group> in the output list, but it doesn't currently. So that could be like a catch all bucket for those unknown files? Eddy -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
