I'm porting our ugly C++ Eclipse projects to tup. We have many-many libraries and executables. So, as a test, I ported a few projects to tup and it works great. However, a co-worker said why not use make instead, and I answered with "auto-dependencies and speed." He agrees with the speed part, but he states that make can do the dependency business, if you provide the right info, like *.cpp, *.h, *.d, etc. and using the GNU -MD flag to generate .d files.
What's your take on this eternal-debate? -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tup-users/4c6ca7a6-c0f9-4288-a224-31f37fcfd44e%40googlegroups.com.
