on 5/8/01 3:19 PM, "Turpin, Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> What are the plans for implementing the siblings of TurbineUser? We have
> moved ahead and begun implementing the new code generated by Torque for all
> of the Turbine tables and am wondering if I should begin creating new
> classes to mirror the User code. For instance, to implement the Group table,
> we would need to create the following interfaces:
> * Group
> * GroupPeer
> * GroupManager
>
> Create the following class: DBGroupManager
>
> and modify BaseSecurityService and SecurityService to dish up the Group
> service code dynamically from the entries in the TR.p file.
>
> Is this the proper approach that is being planned? Have interfaces for these
> files been mapped out yet? If not, we'll just dive in.
>
> Regards,
> Jay Turpin
> Intel Corp
Huh? Group is already an interface. Are you using latest CVS of Turbine?
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
