on 5/10/01 1:27 AM, "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On a slightly related note:
>
> is there any reason why only Java sources contain ASL & copyright but
> templates, docs, buildfiles etc do not? They can be considered just as much
> source code as Java... Does it imply that they are public domain? Not that I
> care about this at all, just curious....
>
> Fedor.
Simply because it is a huge file and putting it in templates that are
non-cached (ie: during development) will affect performance even more. In
.java code, they are compiled out so it doesn't affect anything.
You cannot assume that they are public domain because the package that you
download has a LICENSE.txt file at the top and that governs the entire
package.
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
