Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm sorry I didn't pay attention when you brought this up the first > time, > but I really don't think binding the validation into the peers is really > a good idea. I have to agree with Jason's comment. If this is should go anywhere, it should live in the business objects' setXxx() methods. It is also seems rather unnecessary w/ Intake, but could be used for an additional level of validation (which defaults to turned off). Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/org/apache/turbine/torque/engine/database/model Column.java
- cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/org/apache/turbine/torq... mikeh
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/org/apache/tur... Jason van Zyl
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/org/apache... Mike Haberman
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/org/ap... Jason van Zyl
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/or... Mike Haberman
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/o... Daniel Rall
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/j... Mike Haberman
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/s... Jason van Zyl
- Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbin... Mike Haberman
- cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/org/apache/turbine... dlr
- cvs commit: jakarta-turbine/src/java/org/apache/turbine... dlr
